• Aug 10, 2026 News!Vol.18, No. 3 has been published with online version.   [Click]
  • Jun 29, 2026 News!Vol.18, No. 2 has been published with online version.   [Click]
  • Mar 30, 2026 News!Vol.18, No. 1 has been published with online version.   [Click]
General Information
    • ISSN: 1793-8236 (Online)
    • Abbreviated Title Int. J. Eng. Technol.
    • Frequency:  Quarterly 
    • DOI: 10.7763/IJET
    • APC: 500 USD
    • Managing Editor: Ms. Isa Yuan 
    • Abstracting/ Indexing:  CNKI,  Google Scholar, Crossref, EBSCO  etc.
    • E-mail: ijet_Editor@126.com
IJET 2012 Vol.4(1): 38-45
doi: 10.7763/IJET.2012.V4.315

A Fuzzy Conceptual Design Selection Model Considering Conflict Resolution

A. Sarfaraz , K. Jenab

  • the Department of Manufacturing System Engineering and Management, California State University-Northridge, USA

Abstract

Selecting a design at the conceptual design stage in product development can be complex and frustrating due to imprecise and uncertain product requirements. For many companies, the conceptual design stage is crucial to their product’s success. For example, making a bad decision can lead to costs associated with product recall, redesign, and remanufacture. These unexpected expenses not only could result in profit loss but also jeopardize a successful commercialization of the product. Therefore, the level of success of a product is significantly dependent on the early stage of product development. Managers need robust decision-making tools for valuing potential new product investments in order to justify their development strategy and to allow them to screen out new designs that stand little chance of success at an early stage. However, limitations, such as uncertainty and inability to provide the information on the compatibility between design concepts, remain as challenges for the concept selection method. Therefore, this study proposes a structured conceptual design selection model based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy conflict resolution to express the comparative judgments of decision-makers. Also, we perform a comparative analysis between AHP and FAHP results by applying our model to hospital bed designs. This study proves that although both methods are good, FAHP is more robust because of eliminating inconsistencies resulted from personal feelings or judgments.

Keywords

  • Conceptual design stage
  • AHP
  • Fuzzy AHP
  • ergonomic design
  • design for reliability
  • conflict resolution
315-T851

How to Cite

Copied

A. Sarfaraz and K. Jenab, "A Fuzzy Conceptual Design Selection Model Considering Conflict Resolution," International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 38-45, 2012. https://doi.org/ 10.7763/IJET.2012.V4.315

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2012 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Article Metrics in Dimensions

Copyright © 2009-2026. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. Unless otherwise stated. 
E-mail: ijet_Editor@126.com