• Aug 10, 2026 News!Vol.18, No. 3 has been published with online version.   [Click]
  • Jun 29, 2026 News!Vol.18, No. 2 has been published with online version.   [Click]
  • Mar 30, 2026 News!Vol.18, No. 1 has been published with online version.   [Click]
General Information
    • ISSN: 1793-8236 (Online)
    • Abbreviated Title Int. J. Eng. Technol.
    • Frequency:  Quarterly 
    • DOI: 10.7763/IJET
    • APC: 500 USD
    • Managing Editor: Ms. Isa Yuan 
    • Abstracting/ Indexing:  CNKI,  Google Scholar, Crossref, EBSCO  etc.
    • E-mail: ijet_Editor@126.com
IJET 2012 Vol.4(1): 7-10
doi: 10.7763/IJET.2012.V4.310

Ensemble Systems for Automatic Fracture Detection

S. K. Mahendran 1 , S. Santhosh Baboo 2

  • 1 the Department of Computer Science, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • 2 the Postgraduate and Research department of Computer Science at Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. India

Abstract

Fracture detection based on image classification is an area of research which has proved to be challenging for the past several decades. This field has gained more attention due to the new challenges posed by voluminous image databases. In this research work, fusion-based classifiers are constructed, which extracts features from the images, use these features to train and test the classifiers for the purpose of detecting fractures in X-Ray images. The various features extracted are Contrast, Homogeneity, Energy, Entropy, Mean, Variance, Standard Deviation, Correlation, Gabor orientation (GO), Markov Random Field (MRF), and intensity gradient direction (IGD). Three classifiers, BPNN, SVM and NB classifiers are used. Using these features and classifiers, three single classifiers and four multiple classifiers were developed. All the classifiers were tested vigorously with the test dataset for evaluating the winner combination of classifiers and features that correctly identifies fractures in a bone image. The performance metrics used are sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and execution time. The experimental results showed that usage of fusion classifiers enhances the detection capacity and the combination SVM and BPNN produces the best result.

Keywords

  • X-ray image
  • gabor orientation (GO)
  • markov random field (MRF)
  • intensity gradient direction (IGD)
  • BPNN
  • SVM and NB
310-T834

How to Cite

Copied

S. K. Mahendran and S. Santhosh Baboo, "Ensemble Systems for Automatic Fracture Detection," International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7-10, 2012. https://doi.org/ 10.7763/IJET.2012.V4.310

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2012 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Article Metrics in Dimensions

Copyright © 2009-2026. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. Unless otherwise stated. 
E-mail: ijet_Editor@126.com